evaloha

Executive Health Score

The executive health score for enterprise AI agents

Your company is using AI. But is it accurate, secure, compliant, and cost-efficient?

Measure

Score every AI agent and AI user on accuracy, cost, security, and compliance.

Govern

Catch risky agent actions, data leaks, and policy violations before they spread.

Optimize

Cut token waste and weak output with concrete, model-level recommendations.

One score, every risk

The Executive Health Score

Evaloha helps enterprises measure, govern, and optimize how humans and AI agents work together — across skill, cost, security, compliance, and output quality — in one board-ready score.

73/100

Overall health
AccuracyDo agents give the right answer?

82/100

SafetyAny harmful or misleading guidance?

74/100

SecurityPrompt injection or data-leak risk?

68/100

ComplianceGDPR, KVKK and policy adherence?

71/100

Cost efficiencyIs token and model spend optimal?

59/100

Human skillDo people use AI the right way?

77/100

Business impactIs it producing real outcomes?

80/100

Built for the C-suite

One dashboard, every executive

The same health score answers a different question for each leader — so security, cost, compliance, and operational risk finally live in one place.

CTO

Security

Which agents leak data, run risky tools, or ship insecure AI-generated code.

CFO

Cost

Where tokens are wasted and how much a cheaper model or prompt would save.

CISO

Compliance

GDPR and KVKK exposure, PII access, and policy violations across every agent.

CEO

Operational risk

Whether AI is producing accurate, accountable outcomes the business can trust.

The NeoBank scenario

Three agents, three kinds of risk

A single bank runs a support agent, a coding assistant, and a RAG analyst — each with very different ways to fail. Evaloha scores all three on the same axes.

Customer support agent

Wrong answers aren't just quality — they're trust, regulation, and reputation.

  • Hallucinated balances or account status
  • Policy-violating or off-script answers
  • Unnecessary escalations to human agents
  • Wrong access to customer records
  • Inconsistent answers to the same question

Developer AI

Copilot, Cursor and Claude Code ship fast — but can leave security debt behind.

  • AI-assisted PR risk score
  • Security flaws in AI-generated code
  • Prompt-to-code trace for every change
  • Rework and bug-rate mapping
  • Speed gains vs. added review load

RAG / internal data agent

Answering over customer data is the most sensitive surface of all.

  • Unauthorized data access and PII exposure
  • GDPR / KVKK compliance gaps
  • Missing or wrong source citations
  • Prompt injection and RBAC holes
  • Hallucinated analytics on stale data
This agent tried to reach an unauthorized customer segment 3 times, gave 2 answers without a source, and could have resolved the same question 38% cheaper with a smaller model.
Outcome-based evaluation — not just logs

The platform

Five modules, one control plane

Score, test, optimize, and act — every module feeds the same executive health score, so insight always comes with a next step.

Executive Health Score

One board-ready score across accuracy, safety, security, compliance, cost, skill, and impact.

7 dimensions · CEO / CTO / CISO / CFO views

Agent Evaluation Lab

Scenario-based tests for support, sales, RAG, finance, HR, and coding agents — before and after they ship.

“Does it leak customer data under prompt injection?”

AI Cost Optimizer

Find token waste and model overspend, then route to the cheapest model that still passes your evals.

12.4M tokens · 41% over-long · ~28–35% reducible

Developer AI Usage Score

See AI-assisted PR risk, rework, and one-shot success — at the team level, without surveilling individuals.

We help teams use AI safely — we don't monitor developers.

Recommendation Engine

Every score comes with a concrete fix: change the prompt, swap the model, require sources, revoke PII access, add a human fallback.

Not just a number — the next action

FAQ

Questions executives ask

How do you know if our AI agents are actually accurate?

AgentHealth scores answers against expected outcomes, not just logs — measuring correct-answer rate, hallucination rate, and consistency on repeated questions, per agent and per scenario.

Can you detect when an agent leaks sensitive or unauthorized data?

Yes. We flag unauthorized data access, PII exposure, and prompt-injection attempts, and check whether each agent stays inside its role-based access limits.

Does AgentHealth help with GDPR and KVKK compliance?

It scores every agent on policy and regulatory adherence — missing source citations, out-of-policy answers, and access to data the agent shouldn't see — so compliance gaps surface before regulators or customers find them.

How does it reduce our AI and token costs?

The AI Cost Optimizer finds over-long responses and model overspend, then recommends prompt changes and cheaper model routing that still pass your evals — typically surfacing 28–35% in reducible spend.

Does AI-generated code from Copilot or Cursor create security risk?

We score AI-assisted pull requests for security issues, map rework and bug rates back to AI usage, and trace prompt-to-code — so engineering and security see risk without slowing developers down.

Do you monitor individual developers?

No. We help engineering teams use AI safely and efficiently at the team level. The Developer AI Usage Score is about workflow quality and risk, not individual surveillance.

Which agents and tools can you evaluate?

Customer support, sales, RAG assistants, finance and HR agents, internal chatbots, and coding agents — across providers — all scored on the same accuracy, security, compliance, and cost axes.

Get started

Your company is using AI. Is it accurate, secure, compliant, and cost-efficient?

Get one executive health score for every AI agent and AI user — and the recommendations to improve it.

Explore AgentCheck

Early access · no credit card required